GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) scores 3.3 points higher (20.8 vs 17.5) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($256 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 17.5 | −15.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 15.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $145.77 | −43.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 43.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.10s | 25.09s | +392.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 392.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 15.9% less intelligence, 43.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 392.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill