GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 12.9 points higher (33.7 vs 20.8) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $256; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 20.8, and GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 20.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 33.7 | +62.0% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 62.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $1,737.18 | +579.2% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.10s | 21.27s | +317.1% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 317.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 62.0% more intelligence, 579.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 317.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill