GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 5.7 points higher (26.5 vs 20.8) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $256; both mid-range class). Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 26.5 | +27.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 27.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $282.51 | +10.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 10.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.11s | 6.35s | +24.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 24.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 27.4% more intelligence, 10.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill