GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) scores 12.2 points higher (38.0 vs 25.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1187 vs $993; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.0 | 25.8 | −32.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 32.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,186.77 | $992.88 | −16.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 16.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.47s | 43.10s | +121.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 121.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh): 32.1% less intelligence, 16.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 121.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill