GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) scores 8.8 points higher (38.0 vs 29.2) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1187 vs $538; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M3.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.0 | 29.2 | −23.2% MiniMax-M3 is 23.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,186.77 | $537.98 | −54.7% MiniMax-M3 is 54.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.69s | 25.05s | −25.6% MiniMax-M3 is 25.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh): 23.2% less intelligence, 54.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill