GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh): 11.3% less intelligence, 22.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 100.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.0 | 33.7 | −11.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 11.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,186.77 | $1,458.94 | +22.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 22.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.98s | 64.02s | +100.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 100.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill