GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) scores 32.8 points higher (42.1 vs 9.3) but costs 57× as much to run the benchmark ($2501 vs $44.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 9.3 | −77.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 77.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $43.98 | −98.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 98.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 113.99s | 10.42s | −90.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 90.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 77.9% less intelligence, 98.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill