GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) scores 36.1 points higher (42.1 vs 6.0) but costs 67× as much to run the benchmark ($2501 vs $37.6; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 6.0 | −85.7% Ministral 3 14B is 85.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $37.56 | −98.5% Ministral 3 14B is 98.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.02s | 7.89s | −93.1% Ministral 3 14B is 93.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 85.7% less intelligence, 98.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill