GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 5.6% more intelligence, 97.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.3 | 34.1 | +5.6% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 5.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,250.14 | $95.73 | −97.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 97.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 139.74s | 9.48s | −93.2% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 93.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 54.80 for $3204.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill