GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) scores 24.6 points higher (42.1 vs 17.5) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($2501 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 17.5 | −58.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 58.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $145.77 | −94.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 94.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 104.98s | 24.76s | −76.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 76.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 58.4% less intelligence, 94.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill