GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 10.3 points higher (52.4 vs 42.1) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $2501; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Max).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 52.4 | +24.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 24.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $5,786.78 | +131.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 104.98s | 41.43s | −60.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 60.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 24.5% more intelligence, 131.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill