GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) scores 23.9 points higher (42.1 vs 18.2) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($2501 vs $896; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 18.2 | −56.8% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 56.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $896.39 | −64.2% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 64.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.02s | 46.08s | −59.9% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 59.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.38 / $2.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 56.8% less intelligence, 64.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/qwen3-6-35b-a3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/qwen3-6-35b-a3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill