GPT-5 Codex (High) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

GPT-5 Codex (High) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5 Codex (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8-Flash-NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
39.80
Total cost
$363
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5 Codex (High)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.939.8+59.8% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 59.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$362.72— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.09s50.25s+283.9% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 283.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.25 / $10.0$0.15 / $0.47
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5 Codex (High): what beats itQwen3.8-Flash-Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-codex/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-codex/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill