GPT-5 mini (High) vs gpt-oss-20b (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or gpt-oss-20b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5 mini (High) scores 7.8 points higher (16.8 vs 9.0) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($189 vs $28.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5 mini (High) when you need intelligence above 9.0, and gpt-oss-20b (High) when 9.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | gpt-oss-20b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 9.0 | −46.4% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 46.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $28.81 | −84.7% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 84.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.90s | 15.23s | −75.0% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 75.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.05 / $0.22 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
gpt-oss-20b (High) vs GPT-5 mini (High): 46.4% less intelligence, 84.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- gpt-oss-20b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-5 mini (High)gpt-oss-20b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/gpt-oss-20b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/gpt-oss-20b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill