GPT-5 mini (high) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (high) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 17.2 points higher (43.0 vs 25.8) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $130; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 25.8, and GPT-5 mini (high) when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (high) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 43.0 | +66.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 66.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $130.34 | $544.58 | +317.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 84.95s | 73.20s | −13.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 13.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5 mini (high): 66.7% more intelligence, 317.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
GPT-5 mini (high)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill