GPT-5 mini (High) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-5 mini (High): 29.8% more intelligence, 67.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 21.8 | +29.8% MiMo-V2.5 is 29.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $61.93 | −67.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 67.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.74s | 46.61s | −20.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 20.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-5 mini (High)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill