GPT-5 mini (High) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5 mini (High) scores 10.8 points higher (16.8 vs 6.0) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($189 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5 mini (High) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 6.0 | −64.3% Ministral 3 14B is 64.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $37.56 | −80.1% Ministral 3 14B is 80.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.18s | 7.87s | −87.7% Ministral 3 14B is 87.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-5 mini (High): 64.3% less intelligence, 80.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5 mini (High)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill