GPT-5 mini (High) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5 mini (High)
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-5 mini (High): 35.7% less intelligence, 23.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 10.8 | −35.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 35.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $232.95 | +23.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 23.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.72s | 8.30s | −85.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 85.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5 mini (High)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill