GPT-5 nano (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

GPT-5 nano (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5 nano (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.00
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5 nano (High)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.042.7+228.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 3.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)87.53s25.34s−71.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 71.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.05 / $0.40$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5 nano (High): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-nano/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-nano/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill