GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 12.1 points higher (50.2 vs 38.1) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($521 vs $122; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 38.1, and GPT-6 Luna (Max) when 38.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.2 | 38.1 | −24.1% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 24.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $521.32 | $122.05 | −76.6% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 76.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 77.76s | 90.27s | +16.1% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 16.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High): 24.1% less intelligence, 76.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (High)GPT-6 Luna (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/gpt-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/gpt-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill