GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 16.2 points higher (50.3 vs 34.1) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($573 vs $95.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 34.1, and Muse Ember (Xhigh) when 34.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.3 | 34.1 | −32.2% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 32.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $573.17 | $95.73 | −83.3% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 83.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 77.66s | 9.48s | −87.8% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 87.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High): 32.2% less intelligence, 83.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill