GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High)
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High): 10.2% less intelligence, 352.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.2 | 45.1 | −10.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 10.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $521.32 | $2,358.74 | +352.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 4.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.55s | 28.35s | −65.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 65.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill