GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 39.0 points higher (50.2 vs 11.2) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($521 vs $329; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.2 | 11.2 | −77.7% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 77.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $521.32 | $328.86 | −36.9% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 36.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 73.30s | 43.82s | −40.2% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 40.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High): 77.7% less intelligence, 36.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/qwen3-5-9b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/qwen3-5-9b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill