GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 10.4 points higher (50.2 vs 39.8) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($521 vs $363; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.2 | 39.8 | −20.7% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 20.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $521.32 | $362.72 | −30.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 30.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 73.30s | 50.47s | −31.1% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 31.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High): 20.7% less intelligence, 30.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill