GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 4.3 points higher (46.4 vs 42.1) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $250; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 42.1, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when 42.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 46.4 | +10.2% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 10.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $4,967.35 | +1883.1% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 20× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.52s | 40.31s | +222.0% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 222.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 10.2% more intelligence, 1883.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 222.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill