GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 35.6 points higher (42.1 vs 6.5) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 6.5 | −84.6% Llama 4 Scout is 84.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $73.56 | −70.6% Llama 4 Scout is 70.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.52s | 5.16s | −58.8% Llama 4 Scout is 58.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 84.6% less intelligence, 70.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill