GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 3.0 points higher (45.1 vs 42.1) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 42.1, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when 42.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 45.1 | +7.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 7.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $1,655.27 | +560.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 6.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.72s | 29.43s | +131.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 131.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 7.1% more intelligence, 560.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 131.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill