GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 29.4 points higher (42.1 vs 12.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $234; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 12.7 | −69.8% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 69.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $233.56 | −6.8% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 6.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 22.73s | +91.2% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 91.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 69.8% less intelligence, 6.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill