GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
42.10
Total cost
$250
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)42.17.2−82.9% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 82.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$250.48Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.72s89.78s+605.8% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 605.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.00 / $10.0$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-6.1 Sol (Low): what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill