GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Ring-2.6-1T vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 60.6% less intelligence, 129.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 16.6 | −60.6% Ring-2.6-1T is 60.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $575.60 | +129.8% Ring-2.6-1T is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.52s | 24.45s | +95.3% Ring-2.6-1T is 95.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill