GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 33.8 points higher (47.8 vs 14.0) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($361 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.8 | 14.0 | −70.7% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 70.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $361.37 | $250.37 | −30.7% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 30.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.35s | 5.89s | −59.0% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 59.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 70.7% less intelligence, 30.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill