GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 17.2% less intelligence, 283.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.8 | 39.6 | −17.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 17.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $361.37 | $1,385.40 | +283.4% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 3.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.90s | 20.60s | +48.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 48.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill