GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 35.1 points higher (47.8 vs 12.7) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($361 vs $234; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.8 | 12.7 | −73.4% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 73.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $361.37 | $233.56 | −35.4% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 35.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.94s | 22.73s | +63.1% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 63.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 73.4% less intelligence, 35.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill