GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 37.0 points higher (47.8 vs 10.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($361 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.8 | 10.8 | −77.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 77.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $361.37 | $232.95 | −35.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 35.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.35s | 8.30s | −42.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 42.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 77.4% less intelligence, 35.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill