GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 33.5 points higher (51.0 vs 17.5) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 17.5 | −65.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 65.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $145.77 | −78.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 78.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.31s | 24.76s | −71.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 71.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 65.7% less intelligence, 78.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill