GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 22.4% less intelligence, 109.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 39.6 | −22.4% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 22.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $1,385.40 | +109.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.31s | 20.85s | −75.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 75.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill