GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 35.4 points higher (51.0 vs 15.6) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $661; both premium class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 15.6 | −69.4% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 69.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $661.29 | −0.1% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 0.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 136.89s | 21.24s | −84.5% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 84.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 69.4% less intelligence, 0.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill