GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 60.4% less intelligence, 205.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 20.2 | −60.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 60.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $2,022.49 | +205.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 136.72s | 14.49s | −89.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 89.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill