GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 41.8 points higher (51.0 vs 9.2) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 9.2 | −82.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 82.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $405.10 | −38.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 38.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.31s | 6.44s | −92.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 92.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 82.0% less intelligence, 38.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill