GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 15.6 points higher (51.8 vs 36.2) but costs 9.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $115; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 36.2 | −30.1% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 30.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.55 | $114.52 | −89.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 89.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 291.11s | 6.78s | −97.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 97.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 30.1% less intelligence, 89.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill