GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 45.8 points higher (51.8 vs 6.0) but costs 29× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 6.0 | −88.4% Ministral 3 14B is 88.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.55 | $37.56 | −96.5% Ministral 3 14B is 96.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 374.08s | 7.92s | −97.9% Ministral 3 14B is 97.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 88.4% less intelligence, 96.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill