GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 20.5 points higher (54.6 vs 34.1) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($1124 vs $95.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.1, and Muse Ember (Xhigh) when 34.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.6 | 34.1 | −37.5% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 37.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,123.97 | $95.73 | −91.5% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 91.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 310.73s | 9.48s | −96.9% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 96.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 37.5% less intelligence, 91.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill