GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)

Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.

Clear winner

OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (Max)On the frontier

Intelligence: 51.80
Total cost: $1082

MetaMuse Spark 1.3 (Max)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 48.10
Total cost: $2000

Verdict

Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)

Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 7.1% less intelligence, 85.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.2% faster end-to-end.

Metric	GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)	Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	51.8	48.1	−7.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 7.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$1,081.55	$2,000.35	+85.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 85.0% more expensive
End-to-end time (lower is better)	250.43s	67.10s	−73.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 73.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$2.00 / $10.0	$1.25 / $4.25
Input modalities	Text, Image	Text, Image, Video

Open this matchup in the interactive picker GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): what beats it Muse Spark 1.3 (Max): what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.

GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill