GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 42.9 points higher (51.8 vs 8.9) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $63.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 8.9 | −82.8% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 82.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.55 | $63.74 | −94.1% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 94.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 291.11s | 10.12s | −96.5% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 96.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 82.8% less intelligence, 94.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill