GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 58.7% less intelligence, 5.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 21.4 | −58.7% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 58.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.55 | $1,145.36 | +5.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 5.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 220.48s | 112.14s | −49.1% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 49.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill