GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 49.4% less intelligence, 7.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 26.2 | −49.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 49.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.55 | $1,164.93 | +7.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 7.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 374.08s | 58.18s | −84.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 84.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill