GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.

Trade-off

OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (Max)On the frontier

Intelligence: 51.80
Total cost: $1082

AlibabaQwen3 Coder NextOff the frontier

Intelligence: 9.20
Total cost: $405

Verdict

Depends on your budget

GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 42.6 points higher (51.8 vs 9.2) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.

Metric	GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)	Qwen3 Coder Next	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	51.8	9.2	−82.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 82.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$1,081.55	$405.10	−62.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 62.5% cheaper
End-to-end time (lower is better)	220.48s	6.44s	−97.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 97.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$2.00 / $10.0	$0.31 / $1.00
Input modalities	Text, Image	Text

Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 82.2% less intelligence, 62.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.1% faster end-to-end.

Open this matchup in the interactive picker GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): what beats it Qwen3 Coder Next: what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.

GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill