GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 41.0 points higher (51.8 vs 10.8) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 10.8 | −79.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 79.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.55 | $232.95 | −78.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 78.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 220.48s | 8.30s | −96.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 96.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max): 79.2% less intelligence, 78.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill