GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 10.4 points higher (43.9 vs 33.5) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $154; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 33.5 | −23.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 23.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $153.58 | −35.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 35.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 6.51s | −41.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 41.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 23.7% less intelligence, 35.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill