GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 6.0 points higher (43.9 vs 37.9) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $110; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 37.9 | −13.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $109.55 | −54.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 54.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 47.76s | +328.0% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 328.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 13.7% less intelligence, 54.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 328.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill